How to Respond to Job Rejection—And Even Make It Work For You

US NEWS – By – January 30, 2013 RSS Feed Print

Alison GreenAlison Green

Getting rejected for a job you really wanted is one of the worst parts of job searching. But if you handle the rejection well, you can get something useful out of the disappointment. Here’s how.

1. Don’t get angry. There’s no point in getting angry or taking a job rejection personally. You might think that you were perfect for the job and resent the employer for not seeing it, or even feel angry that you spent your time interviewing. But rejection comes with the territory when you’re hunting for a job, and in a market like this one, even highly qualified candidates get rejected because there’s often someone who is simply a better match for the position. Getting angry will only make it harder for you to continue with your search in good spirits—and can turn into bitterness, which can scare off future employers.

2. Thank your interviewer for their time. Saying thank-you might be the last thing you feel like doing, but send a gracious note thanking the interviewer for her time. Say that you enjoyed meeting her and getting to learn about her company, and ask that she keep you in mind if opportunities open up in the future. Why? Well, first, being polite is never a bad thing to do … but also, stories abound of people whose gracious responses to rejection led to them getting the job when the employer’s first-choice candidate didn’t work out, or being contacted about new openings later on.

3. Ask the hiring manager to give you feedback on how you could be a stronger candidate. This won’t always yield useful information—some employers have a policy of not giving feedback to rejected candidates—but sometimes it will, and you never know until you ask. To maximize your chances of a useful response, it’s crucial that you don’t sound like you’re frustrated or, even worse, challenging the employer’s decision. There’s no faster way to make your interviewer shut down. You also don’t want to sound like the request is a perfunctory email that you send to every interviewer; it needs to sound personal and engaging, so that your interviewer feels rapport with you and is more inclined to respond.

Again, this won’t work every time. But it when it does, you can learn valuable information about how you can do better next time.

4. Stay in touch with the hiring manager. After being rejected, you might want nothing more than to wipe the memory of your interview from your mind and pretend the whole experience never happened—but don’t. That hiring manager is now a business contact, and you should stay in touch. Connect on LinkedIn, check in now and then, send an article that you think she’d like. Don’t be a pest, but don’t let the relationship fade into nothing. She may be able to tell you about another opening some day, either at her company or with a contact.

Alison Green writes the popular Ask a Manager blog, where she dispenses advice on career, job search, and management issues. She’s also the co-author of Managing to Change the World: The Nonprofit Manager’s Guide to Getting Results, and former chief of staff of a successful nonprofit organization, where she oversaw day-to-day staff management, hiring, firing, and employee development.

TECH CAREERS: US Defense Department Ramps up Recruitment for Cyber Army

GLOBAL POSTJanuary 29, 2013 12:55

Responding to threats of cyber espionage and state sponsored cyber attack, US Cyber Command looks to expand its forces by 4000.

Cyber army 01 29 2013

Participants work at their laptops at the annual Chaos Computer Club (CCC) computer hackers’ congress, called 29C3, on December 28, 2012 in Hamburg, Germany. The 29th Chaos Communication Congress (29C3) attracts hundreds of participants worldwide annually to engage in workshops and lectures discussing the role of technology in society and its future. (Patrick Lux/AFP/Getty Images)

In a major expansion of the US Defense Department’s Cyber Command, the Pentagon reportedly plans to recruit thousands of code crackers, online security professionals and even hackers to deploy the nation’s largest ever cyber army.

The command will recruit an additional 4,000 troops and civilians in the expansion of Cyber Command’s personnel to respond to the growing threat of cyber espionage, state-sponsored cyber-attacks and hacker collectives, The Washington Post reported.

“Given the malicious actors that are out there and the development of the technology, in my mind, there’s little doubt that some adversary is going to attempt a significant cyber-attack on the United States at some point,” William J. Lynn III, a former deputy defense secretary who helped fashion the Pentagon’s cyber security strategy, told The Post.

“The only question is whether we’re going to take the necessary steps like this one to deflect the impact of the attack in advance or… read about the steps we should have taken in some post-attack commission report,” he added.

More from GlobalPost: Google defies law enforcement

Pentagon officials and defense contractors have established cyber camps, competitions, scholarships and internships for high school and college students in addition to creating cyber security training programs for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Huffington Post.

“The people do not exist at all,” said Alan Paller to Huffington Post, director of the SANS Institute, a training organization for computer security professionals.

“A program is underway to build a pipeline of the needed people very rapidly,” he added.

The efforts by the Defense Department to train cyber soldiers are an attempt to address the shortage of personnel with the training and knowledge to fight in the digital battlefield. A part of the recruiting efforts will focus on hiring hackers, reported the Huffington Post, especially at global hacker conferences like DefCon where US officials mingle with some of the world’s most prolific code crackers.

The US’ first divisions of cyber soldiers won’t only focus on defense; they will also aid field commanders by bolstering ground offensives with cyber-attacks. While conventional ground forces engage an enemy, cyber warriors could be behind the lines, attempting to bring down the enemy’s technology guiding weapons, munitions and troop movements.

More from GlobalPost: Kim Dotcom’s Mega site launch mired in controversy 

The “combat mission forces,” one of three divisions of the Cyber Command, will aid field commanders by executing cyber-attacks alongside conventional military offensives.

“This new class of cyber warrior would be responsible for penetrating the machines behind identified attack sources, installing spyware to monitor connections to those machines, and following the trail back to the desktop of the attacker. They would have to research and exploit vulnerabilities, craft malware, operate honey pots, and even engage in targeted Denial of Service attacks,” Richard Stiennon, author of Surviving Cyberwar and chief research analyst at IT-Harvest, told GlobalPost.

The “national mission forces” will protect networks and systems that govern the country’s electricity infrastructure and the “cyber protection forces” will focus solely on securing networks and systems operated by the Defense Department.

But such a force of cyber warriors won’t require that IT experts be deployed along battle lines. In fact, some of those hired by US Cyber Command may only be doing the work of an office IT professional with a security clearance.

“The Pentagon has a very broad definition of ‘cyber’ and there is often confusion over the difference between an IT security administrator and a cyber warrior,” said Stiennon.

“Since the Pentagon employs over 2 million people and probably is responsible for a million desktops, servers, and routers it is easy to understand that they could employ an additional 4,000 people to maintain those devices just from a patch management and security administration standpoint,” he added.

Last fall, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned that the US was facing a “cyber-Pearl Harbor” as the country grew increasingly vulnerable to cyber-attacks launched by state actors. Such cyber-attacks could derail the nation’s power grid, financial networks, government systems and transportation infrastructure.

“An aggressor nation or extremist group could use these kinds of cyber tools to gain control of critical switches,” Panetta said.

“They could derail passenger trains, or even more dangerous, derail passenger trains loaded with lethal chemicals. They could contaminate the water supply in major cities, or shut down the power grid across large parts of the country.”

Don’t polish your cyber armor yet.

A senior Pentagon official told Foreign Policy magazine that the program has not formally been given a green light yet.

“There is no doubt that we will expand our [cyber] forces; everyone is on the same page with that,” the official said. “Exactly what the figures are, what they’re called, and their precise makeup, that does remain to be seen. So in concept yes, we’re expanding it. Has it happened on paper yet? No.”

More from GlobalPost: Anonymous targets Mexico in defense of the Zapatistas

Now Hiring? EMPLOYERS: Tips for Conducting Interviews – WORK-BUDDIES: See What They’re Up To!!

The Wall Street Journal – By LAUREN WEBER

It’s not always a candidate’s fault when a job interview goes south.

Hiring managers can commit a litany of sins, such as interrupting interviews to answer phone calls, failing to take notes, acting bored or distracted, bad-mouthing their own companies, bullying applicants, or asking “gotcha” questions for no reason at all, say human-resources consultants. The cost of poor interviews ranges from bad hires to alienated job applicants. At worst, untrained hiring managers can open their employers to lawsuits by asking questions deemed illegal by federal nondiscrimination standards.

[image] Jason Schneider

Don’t Ask

Many common interview questions reveal little about a job candidate. Here are some questions managers shouldn’t ask and the alternatives:

AVOID: “Where do you see yourself in five years?”

  • Hiring managers ask this question to probe a candidate’s career goals, but nobody really knows where they’ll be in five years, said interview coach Pamela Skilling.

ASK INSTEAD: “How would this position fit into your long-term career plan?”

  • This is more likely to get the candidate talking about her goals, and why the job would be a great next step.

AVOID: What kind of people do you have trouble working with?

  • No one answers this question honestly. It also leads candidates to talk about “kinds of people” instead of their own interpersonal skills.

ASK INSTEAD: “Tell me about a time you had a conflict with someone at work.”

  • Real examples show more clearly how a candidate works with different personalities.

AVOID: “Tell me more about your current position.”

  • This is likely to yield a regurgitation of résumé bullet points.

ASK INSTEAD: “Walk me through a typical day in your current role”

  • A candidate’s day-to-day responsibilities can elicit telling details.

AVOID: “Do you have kids?”

  • This is not only a weak question, but an illegal one.

ASK INSTEAD: “Would you be able to work the hours required for this position?”

  • Keep questions focused on the candidate’s ability to do the job.

Source: Skillful Communications

That’s why companies are bringing in coaches and launching training programs to boost managers’ interviewing skills. A relatively small investment—anywhere from $3,500 to $30,000—can make the difference, hiring experts say, between a team that operates at peak performance and one where bad hires drag on productivity and morale.

At iD Tech Camps, a Campbell, Calif., camp provider with 655 permanent and seasonal staff, regional managers were required to complete a daylong interview workshop this past winter. Propane seller J.S. West & Co., of Modesto, Calif., had branch managers participate in a two-day seminar to standardize and enhance interview procedures. And Netherlands-based Royal Philips Electronics NV PHIA.AE -0.92% is rolling out a program next month that will place thousands of U.S. managers in small-group classes to help them improve the quality of hires and candidates’ experience with the company.

Companies tend to assume that practically anyone can conduct a good interview, says Pamela Skillings, founder of New York-based career consulting firm Skillful Communications, which has provided interview training to iD Tech Camps and Columbia University, among others.

Interviewing is a job skill in its own right.

Most managers “wing it,” said Ms. Skillings, and incorrectly assume they can simply follow their instincts to the right hire. That can mean that one candidate gets a thorough interview, while another gets a shorter sit-down if the boss is in a bad mood or busy, she added.

Such inconsistency may lead to unintentionally biased hiring decisions, said Lauren Rivera, an assistant professor at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. Her research has found that interviewers gravitate toward people like themselves, who share their educational backgrounds or interests. “That’s a natural human thing, but firms need to counterbalance that” by requiring a set of prepared questions and a consistent means of scoring and evaluating each applicant, she says.

Researchers from Harvard Business School found that the worst interviewers—those who let their own insecurities or unconscious biases drive the process, for instance—can have a worse effect on hiring decisions than if a candidate were simply chosen at random.

After seeing too many candidates decline job offers, iD Tech Camps wanted its regional managers, who each hire more than 80 seasonal camp directors and staff annually, to probe more deeply into applicants’ abilities and interest level.

Through role-playing exercises in which the “applicant” had a hidden agenda—viewing the job as backup in case plans to move to Paris fell through, for example—participants worked on “not letting candidates get away with vague, generic responses,” said Joy Meserve, vice president of camp operations.

Now managers ask all candidates if they’re interviewing at other companies and whether they would accept an offer if one is extended. “We want people to be absolutely committed,” says Ms. Meserve.

Since the training, Jen Devine, a regional manager based in Weymouth, Mass., said she no longer assumes a candidate is the right fit just because of the relevant experience on their résumés, and she stops herself before giving candidates too many clues about what she wants to hear. For instance, when asking for an example of how a candidate once taught a skill to another person, she refrains from offering anecdotes from her own life.

Ms. Meserve said camp directors’ and instructors’ evaluations of their teams for this year were the strongest she has seen since the company’s founding 13 years ago.

At Philips, managers can take “Interview Process” classes to practice coaxing useful answers from applicants. In the program starting up next month, the company’s human-resources staff will help managers make interviews more pleasant and efficient on both sides of the table.

That means more pre-interview preparation, no trick questions, and reducing the number of times a candidate “goes through the wringer,” said Russell Schramm, head of talent acquisition for Philips’s North America operations.

“We’ve heard about candidates interviewing with 20 people over three days. That’s absolutely absurd” from the applicant’s point of view and unnecessary for making hiring decisions, said Mr. Schramm, who added that Philips found itself losing qualified candidates who got fed up with the company’s hiring process.

Troubling patterns of employee turnover and workers’ compensation claims led J.S. West human-resources manager Brandi Fuller to spend $12,000 on an interviewing coach.

During a training session for the company’s 20 managers last month, the coach warned against questions relating to sensitive areas such as a candidate’s age or personal circumstances, which are illegal to ask. Managers seemed surprised, a reaction that had Ms. Fuller “cringing…I thought we’d made all of that clear before.”

Most interview coaches also target listening skills.

Bosses must do some talking to give job candidates a sense of the company’s culture, says Manny Avramidis, head of global human resources at the American Management Association, a professional-development group. But beware managers who talk too much. The candidate should get 80% of the airtime, says Mr. Avramidis. Otherwise, “it’s a commercial, not an interview.”

The same qualities that make people good interviewers also help them shine in the other parts of their jobs—evaluating information in a thorough and impartial way, for example, and being a good listener.

But these skills don’t always come naturally. “It may sound odd, but active listening takes practice,” says Ms. Skillings of Skillful Communications.

Salary Negotiation: Women DO Negotiate When Job Ads Offer The Option, Study Finds

It’s almost 2013, and American women still earn an average of 79 cents for each $1 made by their male counterparts. Theories abound on why this is — academic studies have suggested that women are less willing to engage in competition, have less human capital than men, or are simply less likely to negotiate on a salary offer.

But a new study from researchers Andreas Leibbrandt of Monash University and John A. List from the University of Chicago may debunk that final idea. The results, published in a working paper sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research, show that women are more likely than men to negotiate their salary when this is explicitly mentioned as an option in a job ad.

The research team discovered this by putting out job ads in nine different U.S. cities for an administrative assistant position. Some ads specifically stated that wages were negotiable; some did not. The researchers then gathered data from the 2,422 jobseekers who responded to the ads.

They found that when the ad explicitly mentioned that wages were negotiable, using phrasing such as “The position pays $17.6 per hour/ negotiable” or “The position pays $17.6 per hour. But the applicant can negotiate a higher wage,” women were more likely to negotiate than men. Men were more likely to negotiate when the job ad read simply “The position pays $17.6 an hour.”

The likelihood of applicants negotiating the hourly wage also varied by their geographic location. Women were more likely to negotiate in Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, San Diego, and San Francisco, whereas men were more likely to negotiate in Denver, Los Angeles, Portland and Washington DC.

In their overall conclusion, Leibbrandt and List wrote: “There are no statistically significant gender differences in the willingness to negotiate wages.” Applicants of both genders were willing and able to ask for more — depending on the wording of the job advertisement.

Great Job Resource: Site Researches and Posts Jobs for All Fields and Industries

Recruitment 2012

LinkedIn Following

  • Group: JOBS 2.0: Job Search Career Networking Staffing. Post Resume -Get Paid by Employers at Resumark .com
  • Subject: Companies Hiring This Week (8 June 2012)

Dawson Maria posted a job: Companies Hiring This Week (8 June 2012)

“Below is a list of companies that provide employment opportunities for this week…http://jobstar.info/companies-hiring-this-week-8-june-2012/”

 

Tap Into The Hidden Job Market – Over 80% of Jobs are Under Advertised

Find jobs you’ll never see advertised. By Julie Wilson

While the term “hidden job market” might conjure images of men in trench coats swapping resumes in dark alleys, finding an unadvertised position is actually a perfectly effective way to find a job.

Experts estimate up to 80 percent of available jobs are unadvertised. That means you won’t find them posted in your local paper or on Internet job boards. You need to dig deeper to access this hidden job market. Here’s how to get started.

Lay the groundwork for success

As with most things in life, proper preparation will pave the way for success. It’s the same with conducting a job search in the hidden job market. According to Hallie Crawford, founder of career coaching services company HallieCrawford.com, that includes setting up your profile on LinkedIn and getting your resume camera ready. “And I don’t care if you’re unemployed or just out of college,” she asserts. “Everyone needs to have a business card.”

It’s also important to define your career goals. “People can’t help you unless you know what you’re looking for and you can tell them what you need help with.”

The American Spirit Issue

YOUR CAREER | Tap into the hidden job market Continue reading

Human Resources Probably Hates Review Time Too So Relax and Shine!!

MSNBC – By Eve Tahmincioglu

It’s no secret that many employees dread performance reviews. What is surprising, however, is that the very people who help promote them in companies dislike them too.

Nearly half of human resources managers don’t think annual performance reviews are accurate appraisals of employee performance, according to a recently released survey by the Society of Human Resource Management and Globoforce, an employee recognition company.

The poll found that 45 percent of HR leaders thought reviews weren’t good gauges of a worker’s performance, compared to 39 percent last year. The increase points to “a more heightened concern from HR leaders about the shortfalls of traditional performance management,” said Globoforce CEO Eric Mosley. The email survey, taken from December 2011 through January 2012, polled 770 HR professionals who work for companies with 500 or more employees.

“Annual performance reviews continue to be the lightning rod for what’s wrong with traditional performance management,” he added.

The benefits versus the pitfalls of such reviews are part of an ongoing debate in American corporations. But there is no real movement to reassess this often-flawed management tool because it’s been around for years and is so ingrained in the workplace.

Samuel Culbert, author of “Get Rid of the Performance Review!: How Companies Can Stop Intimidating, Start Managing–and Focus on What Really Matters,” is calling for the demise of performance reviews.

Culbert, a management professor at UCLA’s Anderson School of Management, is against performance reviews because they can be demoralizing to workers, are not accurate or objective, and they use meaningless metrics.

“If it were God giving me a review that would be fair. But anyone short of God, I don’t think so,” he quipped.

When asked why employers keep administering reviews even though the recent data shows many HR managers aren’t on board, he had a list of reasons.

“Even though they hate getting and giving reviews and know they are bogus, they are comfortable with it,” he explained. “It’s the enemy they know.”

He also believes managers “love the sense of power they get from performance reviews. They like the fact that under the performance review, they are all-knowing. What they say is all that counts. Who doesn’t like that kind of power?”

And in the end, he maintained, it’s the human resources department that gets “much of its power from championing, running and having access to all the reviews. They have a lot of self-interest in preserving this ridiculous, morale-busting and results-damaging practice.”

Globoforce’s Mosley thinks it’s just a matter of habit for most employers, but he said some organizations are looking for alternatives, including “crowdsourcing feedback.”

It’s basically peer-to-peer reviews in real time, he explained. His company provides a web-based solution whereby employees and managers can nominate each other for rewards for a host of things they do at work, everything from helping out on a project to coming up with a new innovation. All that information is documented in a database, and managers can use the data to assess worker performance over a whole year, without forgetting the many contributions employees made, he said.

If crowdsourcing in the review process does catch on, employees will have more than just their boss’ opinion to worry about come review and raise season. It might be time to start playing some office politics.

Where the Jobs are for May 21, 2012 – Men Move into Positions Traditionally Held by Women

Monday, May 21st, 2012, 7:38pm
News

JACKSONVILLE, FL — Move over ladies, here come the men. There’s a changing trend in the workplace. More and more men are starting to take jobs traditionally held by women.

A study by the Pew Center found there has been a lot of growth in the nursing field and the teaching profession by men in the last ten years. Some of the reasons include the lack of “other” jobs available and the better acceptance of men in these professions.

So, where are the jobs today? EverBank has 11 positions available, ranging from Sr. Marketing Manager to Quality Control Analyst. AT&T has 10 jobs, mainly in sales.

The City of Jacksonville Beach has 6 openings, such as firefighter, surf camp teacher and recreation leader. Also, the City of Jacksonville also hiring right now. It has 5 positions open, including Parks Development Supervisor, Pensions Manager, and Graphic Arts Designer.

For more on those jobs, just check out the WorkSource website by clicking here. Make sure to click Employ Florida, then Find a Job. Put in the 32202 zip code and check the 50-mile radius option.

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.13